Ethics And The Ethics Based Questions - 938 Words

This situation, while extreme, presents us with a myriad of different ethical dilemmas involving the respect for life. Although we may not face this kind of grave situation on a daily basis the lessons we can learn from this case study can be applied to the ethics based questions we do encounter in everyday life. By examining the choices and intentions of each of the involved individuals we are able to see the application of different arguments and points of view. While the parties involved differ greatly in their beliefs and convictions, every individual concerned is attempting to protect the sanctity of human life in the way that they believe is best. In order to study these circumstances and the moral implications presented, it is imperative to first ascertain the facts surrounding the situation. This ethical impasse occurs because a couple has come to the doctor in search of medical advice regarding their attempts to have another child. The couple wishes to conceive another child because their 21 year old daughter has been diagnosed with an aggressive form of leukemia. Thus, by having a second child they will produce a bone marrow donor who most likely has the ability to save the life of their existing offspring. However, by doing this they are essentially creating a life as a means to an end and using a person to achieve a desired outcome. This creates an ethical quandary between respecting the life of a young girl by doing everything possible to save her andShow MoreRelatedThe Market System And The Need For Ethics812 Words   |  4 PagesQuestion 1 Discuss the market system and the need for ethics in business and distingu ish it from the law and concepts of virtue and morality. The market system relates to the need for ethics in business, due to the fact that the individuals that are pricing and selling goods to individuals that are negotiating with them for the purchase of those goods or services, should ensure that the exchange between these individuals is fair and just. This is distinguished from the law due to the fact that theRead MoreThe Ethics Of The Public Administration System Essay814 Words   |  4 PagesAdministrative Ethics is one of the terms of Administrative science which begins with and grounded in duty. The nature, meaning and scopes of ethics have overgrown in the course of time. Ethics is thickened to public administration. In public administration, ethics concentrates on how the public administrator should question and reflect in order to be able to act responsibly. We can simply bisect the two by saying that ethics deals with morals and values, while public administration is full of actionsRead MoreThe Difference Between Professionali sm And Ethics1590 Words   |  7 PagesThe difference between professionalism and ethics is professionalism talks about staying professional within your business and always staying up to par about what is going on within a business. Ethics talks about the study of decisions and moral judgment. Ethics is the study of what should be, what is the ultimate good and how to achieve it. People have always thought that the primary purpose of business is to serve society. Business must have a society commitment otherwise businesses cannot enjoyRead MoreHow Critical Thinking and Ethics Affect My Life Essay994 Words   |  4 PagesHow Critical Thinking and Ethics Affect my Life? Heather H. Hubbard Bryant amp; Stratton College Philosophy 250 Mr. Christopher Schwab October 19, 2011 How Critical thinking and Ethics Affect my Life. For this paper I was asked how critical thinking and ethics will affect my career as both a student and a professional, in order to answer that question I must first answer the question of what is critical thinking and ethics. One thing that is certain about success in any and all aspectsRead More0 out of 5 points1002 Words   |  5 Pagesthose in the minority. Correct Answer:   Ã‚   It is difficulty to accurately measure both costs and benefits. ï‚ · Question 2 5 out of 5 points Business executives are finding that a trusting, ethical relationship with a business partner is: Answer Selected Answer:   Ã‚   Often essential in conducting business. Correct Answer:   Ã‚   Often essential in conducting business. ï‚ · Question 3 5 out of 5 points At the core of rights reasoning is the belief that: Answer Selected Answer:   Ã‚   RespectingRead MoreEthics Is Not Moral Or Immoral940 Words   |  4 PagesEthics is not relative to the culture that we live in. Ethics is not based on one countries’ morals. If one country believes something is not morally right, but in other countries it is. This does not mean it is based on the culture to make it moral or immoral. Ethics is not based on one specific society, but ideas. Ethics is about discussions and how theories can be put into effect. If the United States disapproves of cannibalism while another country is completely okay with it. This gives us noRead MoreVirtue Ethics : The True Stem Of Moral Character1445 Words   |  6 PagesJiovanni Rodriguez Philosophy 103 2014 December 2nd Virtue Ethics: The True Stem of Moral Character Moral character is what dictates an individual s decision making and affects their experiences throughout their life. A person s morals can be based off one s upbringing and environmental factors. Virtue ethics is a philosophical view that greatly supports this claim that the choices a person makes and their actions follow those choices, and display their moral character. This is more likelyRead MoreEthics And Ethics : Ethics922 Words   |  4 Pagesanticipating making was my approach to ethics. Over the course of the past fifteen weeks, my knowledge of ethics as well as my approach to ethics has changed. I have become more knowledgeable about the different approaches to ethics and have gained insight as to where I stand in my approach to ethics. One thing that has changed in my approach to ethics since the beginning of the semester is I am now adamant that it is impossible to arrive at a final answer to ethical questions. Learning about the differentRead MoreCan Ethics Be Taught? Essay examples1615 Words   |  7 PagesWhat are ethics? Ethics are the set beliefs and values of an individual which they apply to circumstances relating to morality. To act in an ‘ethical’ manner, an individual must display integrity by doing what they believe to be right. When working within any professional body, an individual will be subjected to circumstances in which personal ethics will come into play. The Accounting profession is no different as ethical questions arise as part of any working day and can effect how an individualRead MoreAffect of Cultural Values And Personal Ethics in Business Decisions1221 Words   |  5 Pagesolder and are in their own right and wrong situations. Values vary from person to person but people have to live and learn to discover what values that he or she hold very dear and close to them. Your values are also intertwined with morals and ethics. Personal values are the standards that people have to live and learn in order to set what is right and what is wrong that they will not accept in their lives. The American culture takes pride in being able to have the freedom of personal values

Women in History Free Essays

Transportation and Trade Pre-History to 1500 CE World Civilizations 1 February 25, 2013 Transportation and Trade From the prehistoric time period to 1500 C. E. there have been many technological advances in the way of transportation and the way that different cultures have used their advances. We will write a custom essay sample on Women in History or any similar topic only for you Order Now In this, the student will attempt to convey to the reader ways that certain world culture areas evolved in the way of transportation to become more successful in transporting their goods for trade. Starting with Ancient Mesopotamia (my personal favorite) there are very many different ways that the Mesopotamians changed their method of travel to accommodate their growing needs for certain goods. Starting by traveling on foot, Mesopotamians would take sling bags and fill them with their goods when they only had a few small items to transport. Maybe a small amount of Barley or wheat to make some bread with or some pickled or dried, salted fish would fit into most sling bags and the person would hang it over one shoulder like the way women carried babies in slings and just walk their route to get the goods t their destination. When they needed to carry moderate loads they would wrap a cloth around their bundle of goods that might also include some meats from beef, sheep, or goats and wrap the bundle onto their back and use their forehead as a balancing point to hold the package of goods steady and keep themselves balanced to be able to walk without problems. Heavier loads however, were loaded onto a quite large pallet and covered in a cloth and tied down with rope. Then the pallet was loaded onto the carrier’s back and carried that way. Due to the strain and limited space, they usually only kept meats and fish within the same or very nearby cities to avoid spoiling. In 3000 BC the Mesopotamians began utilizing donkeys as a mode of travel to carry goods. This enabled them to carry more and heavier items, and also they were able to carry different items as it was not as taxing on the individual traveling and the donkey could bear the weight instead. With the introduction of donkeys as domesticated animals the Mesopotamians were able to transport textiles (cloth and/or fabric). While this is too heavy for a human to be able to carry enough to make the trip lucrative for all involved, using a donkey made it a lot easier to transport. Tied to the back of a donkey in bundles, the ass could walk for miles without needing a break and was able to bear the heaviness of the load. Donkeys enabled Mesopotamians to be able to travel and carry goods as far away as Kanesh in Turkey. The donkeys were also able to transport items such as gold, silver, and precious stones. In order to make the stones enough to make the trip worthwhile, they could not just carry it on foot because it was too heavy once you had enough of these metals to prove enough to accomplish all needs. They could carry more grains also. The donkey was also able to carry wine and lapis lazuli (Mined in Afghanistan large chunks of it were able to be transported to make jewelry to trade. Without donkey assistance they would not have been able to carry enough back at once to make the amount of items needed to trade for survival or profit). Which were both very heavy and needed to be carried by an ulterior method to get to where it needed to go efficiently and effectively. Around 2500-2350 B. C. , boats began being introduced to the Mesopotamians for a way to travel and transport their goods from place to place. Starting with gulf boats, they were Stronger than common river boats, used to transport goods from South Mesopotamia to the Gulf. Made out of reeds and other woods covered in bitumen (A natural tar-like substance that is derived from petroleum to make the wood waterproof). The Mesopotamians were able to continue to transport barley, wheat, and textiles, but now, more of them and much faster. They also became able to transport stone. Mesopotamian Kings sent expeditions in search of unusual stones and carried from the gulf into Mesopotamia. Special woods like pine and cedar from as far away as India were traded in Southern Mesopotamia in trading posts. Pearls, known as fish eyes to the Mesopotamians were also able to be harvested and transported. Pearls were used to make jewelry and were exchanged for Babylonian goods. Carnelian, a red or reddish white mineral that usually came from India was used to make jewelry and to decorate objects was also moved this way first. Copper, mixed with Tin and Bronze, being one of the most important traded goods traded, it came from Anatolia, Iran, and the Gulf. Ivory became available to be moved with the use of the gulf boat as well. Also, reeds cut from along the river banks and woven into mats or tied together as bundles for building boats and houses. Reeds were easier transported by water than by land. Another form of boat that was used later on as needs became greater and more abundant amounts of goods were needed to survive this period was the coracle. The coracle is a small round boat made of animal skins and covered with the bitumen and were paddled or drifted downstream. They mostly used these coracles for moving and transporting fish, (more of it, and some of it was even transported alive in large post. Reeds, grains, and meat from beef, goats and sheep were also moved using coracles. Although the type of goods did not change, the amounts and condition of some of these goods were very different as opposed to the foot or donkey method of traveling. Rafts which were simply logs tied together and placed on top of inflated animal skins. Was good for easy storage of the equipment used for making the rafts as they could be floated downstream and then dismantled upon arrival and the wood could be sold. With rafts the Mesopotamians were able to move more and heavier logs by lashing them together and floating them in the river along with side raft. Larger amounts of reeds and grains for beer and wine were able to be moved easier this way and then the trip was even more advantageous. Assyrians used rafts to move large flat stone slabs to use in decorating their palaces. River boats that were made of reeds bundled and lashed and often covered in bitumen also to waterproof just the same as the coracle and gulf boats were. Usually drifted downstream with the current but then needed to be towed back upstream by various means such as donkeys, oxen or even people. The Mesopotamians carried all of the usual items on these river boats (grain, reeds, logs, wool, wine, and beer). Although, they were also able to carry and transport bricks with much more ease than was available before these boats were used. Bricks were made of mud of baked used to build structures. Normally made near the place to be used, but sometimes needed to be transported to different cities. Moving on to Medieval Europe we have a very simple people. They usually did not go very far if they did leave because everything was so far away that they had to venture for days or even weeks to simply thirty miles and back. Most of the civilians that did travel did so on foot. Most people in Medieval Europe stayed near the places where they were born. Whenever one did venture out, the person would usually be able to walk up to ten or twenty miles to a village, work all day and then walk back again at the end of the day. If the road was well maintained, they could walk further, however, it was uncommon unless need was emergent to go further. If not traveling on foot, the second most available choice after 2500 CE was on horseback. Horses could go much faster and further than a human simply walking to and from a destination. Horses could go as far as thirty miles without needing a break. Would leave it to where the rider was able to accomplish much more with his day and even be able to bring with him some goods to trade where he ended up riding to. When they needed to move more than just a small amount of goods such as locally grown foods to sell or trade or things like wool. Wool was very heavy and a horse could not carry a very large amount on just horseback. They used covered wagons pulled by horse or oxen able to transport silk, wool, and grown foods to trade. Could only go 20 Miles at a time when using horses for pull the wagon or 10 miles at a time (when using oxen oxen) before needed to stop and rest, or repair wagon due to condition of roads. Although this did make the trip take longer that with just one single horse, and also the trip was more lucrative because of the goods that could be carried back using a covered wagon. If there was more than just a moderate amount of supplies or goods they would use sailing ships to transport them. There were a few different types of sailing ship that was used, each one having its own purpose. The first type of sailing ship that was used was a Knarr. This was the most common type used for most people. The Knarr had a sole square rigged sail and was mainly used to move light cargo. The next most available type of sailing ship used was the trade cog. These were single mast, flat bottomed ships with steep sides. The flat bottom allowed the sailors to come into port easier and go right up on land to be able to load and unload the goods and cargo better, faster, and easier. One more type of sailing ship that was used by Medieval Europeans was a hulk. Also having a flat bottom like the trade cog, this ship was easy to dock on land to make boarding and de-boarding of cargo and persons easy. However, unlike the previous ships, the hulk had no mast making oceanic travel impossible in this craft. The hulk was used mainly in canals and rivers due to the limited controllability when attempting ocean traveling. The final two types of sailing ships that were used were the caravel and carrack. Both of these ships were mainly created by the Portuguese for exploration voyages. The caravel had either both square and lateen rigged sails, or simply just lateen rigged sails. The carrack was a rather large ship, much larger than the caravel was. With six sails (a mizzen, a bowsprit, a spritsail, a foresail, and two topsails) this ship was very easily controlled no matter what the conditions. The many different sails made it so that the carrack could sail against the wind. In the Ancient Roman Empire transportation of goods didn’t really pick up too much until the Romans began using ships to move things, on account of how taxing everything was. The invention of their roads did however help with the traveling but the items they had to trade and transport were so far away that they needed to be able to use shipping methods via waterways to get the items moved efficiently and in a method that was worthwhile to the people moving the items and the amounts of goods they needed to move The Romans started using ferries for transportation for crossing and traveling shallow passages. Although these passages could have been waded across, rivers like The Euphrates River had already begun to be inhabited by crocodiles and other harmful creatures. Making it undesired to cross without being on a protecting contraption of some kind. Horse drawn chariots were two wheeled vehicles drawn by three or four horses (later on in history to be drawn by 2 horses) that were hitched side by side. This was a preferred method of transportations for Emperors and other royal persons. They were often made out of wood for the basket and wheels. The chariot was strengthened in some places by bronze or iron. The tires were also made of iron or bronze and the wheels had anywhere from four to eight spokes. Sledges, pulled by oxen were used mainly to transport things that were very large and/or heavy. Sledges were known to carry large statues, animals, bricks and sunbaked soil. Sledges were made of Wood as well, but constructed much sturdier to be able to bear the weight of the large and heavy items that they were carrying. Last but not least, the Romans used ships to transport salves, silk from China, perfumes, cotton, precious stones, spices, and precious metals. The romans differed on which ones they used the three most common types of ships that were used were rafts, sailing ships, and merchant ships. References Leokum, A. â€Å"When Were Ships First Used† The Free Lance Star October 24, 1968, Tell Me Why! Pg. 23 Print. Beller, Steven. â€Å"Vienna. † The World Book Encyclopedia. 2009 ed. Print. O’Brien, Patrick Karl. â€Å"THE FIRST CIVILIZATIONS: MESOPOTAMIA AND THE INDUS REGION 4000-1800 BC† Oxford Atlas of World History. First published in 2002 by Philip’s an imprint of Octopus Publishing Group Second edition 2005 Reprinted with revisions 2007. Print. Singman, Jeffrey L. Blaine, Bradford B. Daily Life in Medieval Europe Speculum Vol. 76, No. 2 (Apr. , 2001), pp. 523-524 Published by: Medieval Academy of America Stable URL: http://www. jstor. org/stable/2903521 Nelson, Eric. â€Å"All Roads Lead To Rome† Complete Idiot’s Guide to the Roman Empire August, 2011 Print. Derived from: http://site. ebrary. com. proxy-library. ashford. edu/lib/ashford/docDetail. action? docID=10048566;p00=ancient%20roman%20travel%20trade How to cite Women in History, Papers

In migration And Immigration Law Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the In migration And Immigration Law. Answer: Do not live separately and apart on a permanent basis In migration and immigration law, the term determination of living separately and apart on a permanent basis is determined if the marriage is legal, a registered relationship and may also include a de facto relationship which ceases to exist. The partners of the relationship cease to be treated as members of a couple. [1]By definition, living separately and apart is determined when a legally married couple who are in a registered marital institution, are by measures put in place determined to be living separately and apart indefinitely or on a permanent basis and a deemed to be separated. The general provisions of this law is determined if a couple claim that There is a breakdown in their marriage or an estrangement of the same, and They have established that they are living separately indefinitely or the separation is permanent. In migration law, it states that the physical and emotional separation is required to be seen between the couple. There are other conditions which should generally not be accepted if a couple is living separately. These includes; living separately because of ill-health, economic reasons like unemployment between one partner or the both of them or any other issues that may arise. Any other option should be determined and explored to establish the cause and reason for a married couple to live separately and permanently. The determination of an illness in separated couple The law states that a couple may be determined to be living separately and apart where one couple is living in an approved institution example a nursing home to reside there on a full time basis or a permanent basis.[2] The cause of the residence is due to a debilitating illness or a severe condition like the Huntingtons disease, the Alzheimer disease(ALS advanced stages) or maybe a mental disorder. De jure A de jure or a legally married couple can only be determined if the marriage is legalized. Members of a couple who have a debilitating condition or illness like the Huntingtons disease or the ALS advanced are cognizant of the fact that the other partner is physically, emotionally and mentally incapable of responsibly participating in a couples relationship.[3] They do not therefore meet the criteria of determining a member of a couple. In this case, the conclusion reached in a couple living separately after being affected a disease and institutionalized is; the conclusion should be reached if; The incapacitation of a partner is severe and the disease is of a permanent nature eg the ALS The partner institutionalized no longer gives the other partner companionship, emotional, physical and intellectual support and comfort. There are conditions where the factors do not invalidate living apart and separately; the factors include The other partner does visit the institutionalized partner on basis which is regular He or she provides financial supports to the partner financially Taken no action in filling for a separation through a legal divorce Under the law, the assessment is; Individuals living separately and apart are deemed to be single and paid a single rate of income. Only one individual does income and asset assessment test. Federal Court in SZOXP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection full decision in context Background of the case It was interesting that the applicant chose not to live in the same house with the sponsor because of religious beliefs. The applicant citizenship is of the peoples republic of china. [4]He therefore filled a partners visa application due to his relationship which is de facto with the sponsor in the year 2012 October. The couple was in a relationship and had married for a month after the application of the visa. Immigration department on the other hand had refused to give them the visa they applied for on grounds that they must give evidence that they were together prior to the application of visa. The department refused to give the visa application on grounds that the sponsor and the applicant had not lived in a de facto relationship. This was a conclusion by one of the officer[5]. The application had undergone a very long a tedious process for assessment of the partners offshore visa. The department claims that it had not been informed about the marriage and it did not approve application of the visa on marital basis. When the refusal of the application of the visa was brought in before MRT, it was found by the tribunal that the couples had indeed stayed together since 2011 December. Both parties prophesied Buddhism and initially decided to get into the precepts of Buddhism which advocate against cohabiting or living together. MRT tribunal found that the de facto relationship requirements had been fully satisfied. They were now living together and therefore there was no basis of denying them the visa they had applied for. In migration law, it states that the physical and emotional separation is required to be seen between the couple. There are other conditions which should generally not be accepted if a couple is living separately. [6]These includes; living separately because of ill-health, economic reasons like unemployment between one partner or the both of them or any other issues that may arise The federal court only reviewed the language of the law and the migration Act and found that if the couple proved proof of cohabiting, it simply does not establish the basis for a de facto relationship. Under the Act section 5CB, a person is deemed to be in a defacto relationship if There is a mutual commitment to shared life and the exclusion of all others, A continuing and genuine relationship And they have to show if they have lived together or have not live separately and apart in a permanent basis. Decision/ Rulling The court found that interpretation of statutory law should not be read as if there contains additional words. The ministers submission of section 5BC should be interpreted from the express wording. The statutory interpretation principles The principle that were applied by federal judges in construing the phrase are; that the legal defination of the Act do not say that the couples should have cohabited. The court in this case applied the interpretation of additional words in the principles of statutory interpretation.[7] The additional words would be too much at a variance with the language in the legislative wording. The federal court ruled that the ministers submissions in this sections should be analysed as if it included a requirement which is absent from the literal wording section. The court gave an example of this wording crashed and burned and went down in flames as an example of the literal wording interpretation of the legislature. The federal court only reviewed the language of the law and the migration Act and found that if the couple proved proof of cohabiting, it simply does not establish the basis for a de facto relationship. Under the Act section 5CB, a person is deemed to be in a relationship which is de facto relationship when There is a commitment which should be mutual and life sharing and there should be no other party, A continuing and relationship which is genuine have to show if they have lived together or have not live separately and apart in a basis which is permanent. General provisions of this law is determined if a couple claim that There is a breakdown in their marriage or an estrangement of the same, and They have established that they are living separately indefinitely or the separation is permanent. In migration law, it states that the physical and emotional separation is required to be seen between the couple. The sponsor and the applicant premised the application of the document on the rate of a de jure relationship at the event of visa application. They were intending to get married when they lodged the visa application when in truth they had already married for a month. The controversy entirely and wholeley should have already been rectified if they had argued on a prospective marriage to get the visa or they should have waited for a month and applied for the visa on basis that they are actually legally de jure or married[8]. The federal courts interpretation is that under the legislation itnot a problem if the sponsor and the applicant do not References Attwood, Bain, Andrew Markus and Bain Attwood,The 1967 Referendum(Aboriginal Studies Press, 2007) Crock, Mary E and Laurie Berg,Immigration, Refugees And Forced Migration(Federation Press, 2011) Easteal, Patricia Weiser,Less Than Equal(Butterworths, 2001) Immigration Legislation(LexisNexis NZ, 2009) Nettelbeck, Amanda et al,Fragile Settlements PROPER, EMBERSON EDWARD,COLONIAL IMMIGRATION LAWS(FORGOTTEN BOOKS, 2016) Vrachnas, John,Migration And Refugee Law(Cambridge University Press, 2012) White, Michael W. D,Australian Offshore Laws(Federation Press, 2009)